Bench Tools Free browser-based calculators for the lab and for bioinformatics

Tools›Bench Calculators

Beer-Lambert Law Calculator: Absorbance, Extinction Coefficient, and Concentration

Solve for absorbance, extinction coefficient, concentration, or path length using Beer-Lambert law — enzyme assays, NAD(H) kinetics, small-molecule QC.

Core Formula

The Beer-Lambert Law describes the degree to which light is absorbed as it passes through a solution:

A = ε × c × l

With any three of the four variables known, the fourth can be solved:

Solve for concentration:          c = A / (ε × l)
Solve for extinction coefficient: ε = A / (c × l)
Solve for absorbance:             A = ε × c × l
Solve for path length:            l = A / (ε × c)

Commonly Referenced Extinction Coefficients

Substance Wavelength ε (M⁻¹cm⁻¹) Reference
NADH 340 nm 6 220 Horecker & Kornberg, J Biol Chem 1948;175:385–390, PMID 18873313
NADPH 340 nm 6 220 Same as NADH (the chromophore is the reduced nicotinamide ring; the phosphate group does not contribute to absorption at this wavelength)
NAD⁺ 260 nm 18 000 Standard biochemistry handbook value

The ε of NADH at 340 nm = 6 220 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ is the most widely cited extinction coefficient in biochemistry. All enzyme activity assays that depend on the NAD⁺/NADH cofactor — lactate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase, alcohol dehydrogenase, and others — use this value for quantification; it is a known constant, usable directly like Avogadro’s number.

Applicable Range

  1. Linear range A = 0.1–0.8: Above A = 1.0, stray light and detector nonlinearity cause readings to be systematically low, leading to underestimation of concentration. If the sample is too concentrated, dilute and remeasure, then multiply by the dilution factor.
  2. Monochromatic light: The law assumes incident light of a single wavelength. With broadband filters, positive nonlinearity appears at high absorbance values.
  3. Dilute solutions: At high concentrations (generally > 10 mmol/L), intermolecular interactions alter the electronic environment, ε is no longer constant, and the law breaks down.
  4. Clear, homogeneous solutions: Turbid or particulate samples exhibit artificially elevated absorbance due to scattering (Tyndall effect), making any derived “concentration” meaningless. Centrifuge to clarify before measuring.

Common Errors

A Complete Worked Example (subtract ΔA yourself — the calculator handles the rest)

Scenario: LDH enzyme activity assay, 1 cm cuvette, monitoring the decline in 340 nm absorbance as NADH is consumed.

t = 0 s:   A = 0.755
t = 60 s:  A = 0.133
ΔA = 0.755 − 0.133 = 0.622   ← subtract this yourself
(both readings fall within the linear range 0.1–0.8)

ε = 6 220 M⁻¹cm⁻¹, l = 1 cm

Δc = ΔA / (ε × l)
   = 0.622 / (6 220 × 1)
   = 1.000 × 10⁻⁴ mol/L
   = 100.0 µM

100 µM of NADH was consumed in 60 seconds. This result can be used directly to calculate enzyme activity (µmol/min), then divided by protein mass to obtain specific activity (µmol/min/mg).

FAQ

Where do I find the molar extinction coefficient?

Published literature or reagent datasheets provide ε values for a compound at a specific wavelength. The most widely used value is NADH at 340 nm: ε = 6 220 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ (Horecker & Kornberg, J Biol Chem 1948;175:385–390, PMID 18873313). Almost all enzyme activity assays using NAD⁺/NADH as a cofactor rely on this value. For other compounds, check PubChem or the supplier's Certificate of Analysis (CoA).

Up to what absorbance can I trust the reading?

Most spectrophotometers are most linear between A = 0.1 and 0.8. Above A = 1.0, stray light and detector nonlinearity cause readings to be systematically low, underestimating concentration. If your sample is too concentrated, dilute to A < 1.0, remeasure, and multiply back by the dilution factor.

My plate reader uses a 96-well plate — the path length is not 1 cm. What value should I enter?

100 µL of sample in a standard 96-well plate gives a path length of approximately 0.26 cm; 200 µL gives about 0.52 cm. Enter the actual path length directly in the 'Path length l' field — the formula is general. Using 1 cm without correction will underestimate concentration by 2- to 4-fold.

I have a molar concentration — how do I convert to mg/mL?

mg/mL = molar concentration (mol/L) × molar mass (g/mol). For proteins, we recommend first using the on-site 'Protein MW and A280' tool to compute both ε and molar mass from the amino acid sequence, then returning here to calculate concentration.

Related tools

Buffer pH Temperature Correction Calculator (Tris / HEPES / MOPS)

Enter preparation and working temperatures to get pH drift and room-temperature set point; Tris shifts 0.28 pH per 10°C — over ten times phosphate buffer.

Circular Dichroism Mean Residue Ellipticity Calculator (CD [θ]MRE and Δε)

Enter raw ellipticity (mdeg), protein concentration, and path length to get [θ]MRE and Δε, with path-length unit reminders to prevent order-of-magnitude errors.

ChIP-qPCR Percent Input Calculator (% Input Enrichment Analysis)

Calculate ChIP % Input enrichment per locus; enter input fraction and Ct values, with IgG normalization — prevents the classic dilution-factor error.

No ads, no tracking, no sign-up — and every formula here is checked against a known answer. Keeping it that way takes ongoing work. If it saved you time, buy me a coffee.
Buy me a coffee