Bench Tools Free browser-based calculators for the lab and for bioinformatics

Tools›Sequence Analysis Tools

Online DNA GC Content and Tm Calculator

Calculate GC%, base composition, molecular weight, and two empirical Tm values — for rapid primer screening.

GC content determines duplex stability: G-C pairs form three hydrogen bonds, A-T only two, so higher GC content raises the melting temperature. Primer design generally aims for a GC% of 40–60%.

Tm (melting temperature) — two empirical formulas are provided here, each suited to a different length range; do not apply them interchangeably:

To be clear: both are empirical estimates that do not account for salt concentration, primer concentration, or nearest-neighbor thermodynamic parameters. For setting a PCR annealing temperature, use the nearest-neighbor Tm calculator or run a gradient PCR. This tool is for rapidly eliminating obviously unsuitable candidate sequences.

Molecular weight is calculated for the single strand, and two values are given: the 5′-phosphate form (sum of residue masses plus one water molecule), and the 5′-OH form (79.98 less than the former, one HPO₃). Primers from synthesis companies ship as 5′-OH by default; the μg-to-nmol conversion on order sheets uses the 5′-OH value. For reconstitution volume after receiving your primer, see the oligo resuspension and dilution calculator.

How much do the two formulas differ: a real example

For the 20 nt primer GCATCGATCGATCGATCGAT with exactly 50% GC:

Wallace rule           60.0 °C
GC empirical formula   51.8 °C

A difference of 8.2 °C. Since annealing temperature is typically set about 5 °C below Tm, that gap is enough to determine whether a PCR yields a clean specific band or a smear of non-specific products.

Why Wallace overestimates

The Wallace rule reflects conditions of high salt with one strand immobilized (approximately 0.9 M salt). In actual PCR, both strands are free in solution and salt concentration is much lower, so the real Tm is roughly 7–8 °C below the Wallace estimate — which accounts for the gap shown above.

The takeaway: Wallace is for quick mental screening, not for setting annealing temperatures.

The right approach for real experiments

For setting PCR conditions, use the nearest-neighbor thermodynamic model (SantaLucia parameter set). It accounts for base-stacking of adjacent pairs, primer concentration, salt concentration, and divalent magnesium — the actual algorithm behind primer-design software and supplier Tm calculators. This site’s nearest-neighbor Tm calculator does exactly that; this tool does not, because the model requires a full set of experimentally measured thermodynamic parameters and its output depends strongly on your actual reaction conditions.

This tool is for rapid screening of obviously unsuitable candidates: GC too high or too low, wrong length, extreme composition. Once candidates are selected, determine annealing temperature with the supplier’s calculator or gradient PCR.

What else to check beyond GC content

FAQ

The two Tm results differ — which should I trust?

It depends on sequence length. Use the Wallace rule for sequences under 14 nt, and the GC empirical formula for 14–50 nt. Both are estimates; for setting annealing temperature, use the nearest-neighbor Tm calculator or rely on gradient PCR measurements.

My primer has acceptable GC content but PCR fails — why?

GC% is only the coarsest filter. Also check whether the 3′ end forms a hairpin, whether primer dimers form, and whether the primer sequence is unique in the template. This tool does none of those checks.

Why does my Tm differ from the supplier's website?

Because the algorithms differ. Suppliers use the nearest-neighbor thermodynamic model, which incorporates primer concentration, Na⁺, and Mg²⁺ concentrations; this tool provides two empirical formulas that ignore those parameters. A 5–10 °C discrepancy is normal. For setting experimental conditions, defer to the supplier's calculator or gradient PCR.

Why is molecular weight calculated for the single strand?

Primers, probes, and single-stranded oligonucleotides are sold by single-strand molecular weight, used to convert nmol to μg. Double-stranded DNA requires summing both strands, which is a different scenario (this site's nucleic acid concentration converter handles the double-strand case). Also choose the right terminus: synthesized primers ship as 5′-OH by default; the 5′-phosphate form is only present if phosphorylation was explicitly ordered. The difference is one HPO₃ (79.98 g/mol), roughly 1.3% for a 20 nt primer.

Related tools

DNA to Protein Translation — Six-Frame Online Tool

Standard genetic code (NCBI table 1): single-frame or six-frame translation with ORF finder.

FASTA File Statistics: Sequence Count, Length Distribution, and N50

Paste a multi-FASTA and instantly get sequence count, total length, N50/L50, GC content, and length distribution.

Protein Molecular Weight, Isoelectric Point & 280 nm Extinction Coefficient Calculator

Enter an amino acid sequence to compute molecular weight, theoretical pI, molar extinction coefficient, and A280 at 1 mg/mL.

No ads, no tracking, no sign-up — and every formula here is checked against a known answer. Keeping it that way takes ongoing work. If it saved you time, buy me a coffee.
Buy me a coffee