Bench Tools Free browser-based calculators for the lab and for bioinformatics

Tools›Research Utilities

Figure Size and Resolution Calculator for Journal Submission (mm / inch / px / DPI)

Calculate the required pixel dimensions for journal figures from column width and DPI, and check whether your existing image meets the spec.


One of the most common revision comments after submission is “figure resolution is insufficient.” There is really just one formula:

pixels = physical size (inch) × DPI
1 inch = 25.4 mm

So converting a column width given in millimetres to pixels:

px = mm ÷ 25.4 × DPI

The key point: DPI is not an intrinsic property of the image — physical size is. A 3000 × 2000 image has no meaningful DPI on its own. It is only “300 dpi” when you specify that it will be printed 10 inches wide. Journal requirements therefore always come in pairs: column width + DPI.

Typical journal requirements (always verify against the actual author guidelines — the figures below are order-of-magnitude references only):

Use Typical DPI
Line art / rasterised vector (line art) 1000–1200
Greyscale images, photographs (halftone) 300
Line art combined with photographs (combination) 500–600

For column width, single-column is commonly 85–90 mm and double-column 170–180 mm. Always check the exact values in the target journal’s author instructions — requirements vary considerably across publishers.

Two practical recommendations:

A worked example

Double-column figure, column width 170 mm, journal requires 300 dpi:

px = 170 ÷ 25.4 × 300 = 2008 px (width)

Same width at different DPI values:

DPI Required pixel width Typical use
300 2008 Photographs, greyscale images
600 4016 Combination figures
1200 8032 Pure line art, diagrams with small labels

Why line art requires 1200 dpi while photographs only need 300

Photographs are continuous-tone images — neighbouring pixels blend naturally, and 300 dpi is sufficient for the human eye to perceive no pixellation. Line art and text have hard edges. At insufficient resolution, edges develop aliasing and grey fringing. Small labels (6–8 pt in figure captions) are especially susceptible — this is the most common source of “figure not clear enough” comments from editors.

The deciding criterion is not “does the figure look good” but “does the figure contain fine lines or small text”.

File size: be prepared

A 2008 × 1417 pixel RGB raster image (170 × 120 mm at 300 dpi) is approximately 8.5 MB uncompressed. At 600 dpi the file is four times larger; at 1200 dpi, sixteen times.

Many journals set a per-file size limit. Strategies: - Export line art as vector (PDF/EPS/SVG): no DPI concerns and smaller file size - For raster files, use TIFF + LZW compression (lossless) rather than uncompressed TIFF - Save greyscale content in greyscale colour mode rather than RGB — this reduces file size to one third

Do not save line art as JPEG. JPEG compression is designed for continuous-tone images and produces visible ringing artefacts around hard edges. Editors will notice immediately.

FAQ

My figure is 300 dpi — why was it sent back for revision?

DPI must be read together with physical size. An image labelled '300 dpi' but only 5 cm wide has an effective resolution of about 83 dpi when placed in an 18 cm column.

Can I upscale the image by interpolation to meet the requirement?

No. Interpolation adds no information, and editors can tell. Go back to the source application and re-export at the target physical size.

Do vector images need to worry about DPI?

No. PDF/EPS/SVG have no DPI concept, scale without degradation, and most journals prefer vector formats.

My image is already 300 dpi — why was it still rejected?

The physical size is most likely wrong. DPI is only meaningful when paired with physical size. An 800×600 image labelled '300 dpi' is only 67 mm wide; placed in a 170 mm column it has an effective resolution of about 120 dpi. To verify: use this tool to calculate how many pixels your target column width and DPI require, then check whether your image has enough.

Can I use software to enlarge the image to meet the requirement?

No. Interpolating from 150 dpi to 600 dpi adds no information — it simply spreads each pixel across sixteen, making edges blurrier rather than sharper. The correct approach is to return to the source application and re-export at the target physical size and DPI. Your original data is still there, and re-exporting costs far less than going through another round of revision.

Related tools

Word Count for Mixed Chinese–English Text (Abstract / Submission Limits)

Counts Chinese characters, English words, and total characters separately, with an option to exclude references and figure captions.

Microscope Pixel Size and Nyquist Sampling Calculator (Resolution Depends on Pixels, Not Magnification)

Computes effective pixel size at the sample (µm/pixel), diffraction-limited resolution, and Nyquist sampling ratio from camera pixel size, objective magnification, and NA.

Z-Stack Step Size Calculator (Axial Resolution & Nyquist Sampling)

Enter imaging mode, emission wavelength, NA, and immersion medium to get axial resolution and optimal z-step size, plus slice count for any stack depth.

No ads, no tracking, no sign-up — and every formula here is checked against a known answer. Keeping it that way takes ongoing work. If it saved you time, buy me a coffee.
Buy me a coffee